Mineral vs. Toxin SPF Guide

Mineral vs. Toxin SPF Guide

When it comes to sun protection, not all sunscreens are created equal. The debate between mineral (physical) SPF and toxin-based (chemical) SPF is one that’s been growing louder in the skincare community. Understanding the difference can not only help you make more informed decisions but also protect your skin from harmful UV rays while maintaining your body’s hormonal balance.

What is Mineral SPF?

Mineral SPF, also known as physical sunscreen, uses natural minerals like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide to protect your skin from the sun. These minerals act as a physical barrier, sitting on the surface of your skin and reflecting UV rays away before they can cause damage. Because they are not absorbed into the skin, mineral sunscreens are often recommended for people with sensitive skin and are considered safer for both human health and the environment.

What is Toxin-Based SPF?

Toxin-based SPFs, often labeled as chemical sunscreens, contain synthetic ingredients like oxybenzone, avobenzone, octinoxate, homosalate and more. These chemicals work by absorbing UV rays, converting them into heat, and then releasing that heat from the skin. While effective, these chemicals are absorbed into the body, and some have been linked to hormone disruption and environmental harm. Read here one of the studies by FDA about the absorption of chemical ingredients into bloodstream from SPF use.


Risks of Toxin-Based SPF:

-Can cause skin irritation and allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.
-
Linked to hormone disruption due to ingredients like oxybenzone and octinoxate.
-Contributes to coral reef bleaching when washed off in oceans.
-Requires reapplication more often than mineral sunscreens as the chemical bonds break down.

How Do They Affect Hormones?

One of the major concerns with toxin-based SPFs is their potential to disrupt the endocrine system. Chemicals like oxybenzone or octinoxate are known as endocrine disruptors, which means they can interfere with hormone function. Octinoxate — the most widely used UVB-absorbing agent in sunscreen today, produces estrogen, like activity and may also target thyroid function. This is particularly concerning for women, children, and pregnant women who are more vulnerable to hormonal imbalances. Mineral sunscreens, on the other hand, do not absorb into the bloodstream and therefore do not pose this risk.

Which SPF is Better for You?

Choosing the right SPF depends on your skin type, environmental concerns, and personal health priorities. If you’re looking to avoid toxins and protect hormonal health, mineral SPF is the clear winner. It provides effective protection without the risks associated with chemical absorption. However, it’s important to choose a broad-spectrum mineral sunscreen that protects against both UVA and UVB rays for complete coverage. Also, yes - we know that mineral sunscreens tend to leave a white cast, but keep in mind that your health is more important than having to rub the cream more often on your skin until the white comes off..

If you’re thinking about switching to mineral SPF, look for products that are labeled as “non-nano” zinc oxide or titanium dioxide. Non-nano means the particles are larger and won’t be absorbed into the bloodstream. Additionally, seek out brands that are reef-safe and free from parabens, phthalates, and synthetic fragrances.

Your skin is your body’s largest organ, and what you put on it matters. By choosing mineral SPF over toxin-based options, you’re not only protecting your skin from sun damage but also supporting your overall health and the environment. 



Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.